Thumbnail
Access Restriction
Authorized

Author Krishnamoorthy, K. M. ♦ Dash, P. K.
Source Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology
Content type Text
Publisher Journal of Heart Valve Disease
File Format PDF
Language English
Subject Domain (in DDC) Technology ♦ Medicine & health ♦ Diseases
Subject Domain (in MeSH) Cardiovascular Diseases ♦ Diseases
Subject Keyword Cardiology
Abstract Background and aim of the study: The study aim was to investigate the factors that affect changes in cardiac output (CO) following balloon mitral valvulotomy (BMV), which at present are essentially unknown.Methods: Among a total of 168 patients, clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic data before and after BMV were compared between patients in group I (<15% increase in CO after BMV) and group II (>15% increase). A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors that were predictive of an increase in CO.Results: Before BMV, the mean CO was 3.9 +/- 0.9 and 4.1 +/- 0.7 I/min (p = NS) in groups I and II, respectively. Group I patients were more symptomatic, with a greater proportion in NYHA class >= 3. The pulmonary artery mean pressure (PAMP) was also higher in group I patients (51 +/- 20 mmHg) than in group II (35 +/- 12 mmHg) (p <0.03). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was also higher in group I than in group II (6.9 +/- 3.6 and 4.0 +/- 3.0 Woods units, respectively; p <0.02). Right ventricular function, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), heart rate, mitral valve area, transmitral mean gradient, Wilkin's valve score and incidence of atrial fibrillation were similar in both groups. After BMV, the CO was 4.1 +/- 0.8 and 4.8 +/- 0.8 I/min (p <0.005) in groups I and II, respectively. Likewise, there was similar inter-group increase in valve area and a decrease in mean gradient. The PAMP was reduced in both groups compared to pre-BMV, but remained higher in group I than in group II (35 +/- 17 and 21 +/- 9 mmHg, respectively; p <0.05). PVR was decreased in group II and remained higher in group I (2.8 +/- 1.8 and 6.1 +/- 2.6 Woods units, respectively; p <0.05). The magnitude of iatrogenic interatrial shunt was similar in both groups. Following BMV, a >50% fall in PVR was predictive of an increase in CO by 15% (OR 5.7, 95% CI 3.1-7.8).Conclusion: Patients with a post-BMV increase in CO had a lower pre-procedure PAMP and PVR. In group 1, a high PVR ('second stenosis') did not fall after BMV. In spite of an apparent overall improvement in hemodynamics, there was a suboptimal rise in CO. PAMP, despite a significant fall, remained higher than normal. The pulmonary hemodynamics were seen to influence changes in CO after BMV, despite similar changes in valve area and mean gradients, with similar Wilkin's scores and right ventricular function between the two groups. A fall of >50% in PVR is predictive of a post-BMV increase in CO.
Education Level UG and PG
Learning Resource Type Article
Educational Framework Medical Council of India (MCI)
Journal JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE
Volume Number 18
Issue Number 2
Page Count 7
Starting Page 128
Ending Page 134