Thumbnail
Access Restriction
Open

Author Hamstra, Daniel A. ♦ Mariados, Neil ♦ Sylvester, John ♦ Shah, Dhiren ♦ Karsh, Lawrence ♦ Hudes, Richard ♦ Beyer, David ♦ Kurtzman, Steven ♦ Bogart, Jeffrey ♦ Hsi, R. Alex ♦ Kos, Michael ♦ Ellis, Rodney ♦ Logsdon, Mark ♦ Zimberg, Shawn ♦ Forsythe, Kevin ♦ Zhang, Hong ♦ Soffen, Edward ♦ Francke, Patrick ♦ Mantz, Constantine
Source United States Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information
Content type Text
Language English
Subject Keyword RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ♦ GY RANGE 10-100 ♦ HYDROGELS ♦ MEN ♦ NEOPLASMS ♦ PROSTATE ♦ RADIOTHERAPY ♦ RECTUM ♦ TOXICITY
Abstract Purpose: SpaceOAR, a Food and Drug Administration–approved hydrogel intended to create a rectal–prostate space, was evaluated in a single-blind phase III trial of image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy. A total of 222 men were randomized 2:1 to the spacer or control group and received 79.2 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions to the prostate with or without the seminal vesicles. The present study reports the final results with a median follow-up period of 3 years. Methods and Materials: Cumulative (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) toxicity was evaluated using the log-rank test. Quality of life (QOL) was examined using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and the mean changes from baseline in the EPIC domains were tested using repeated measures models. The proportions of men with minimally important differences (MIDs) in each domain were tested using repeated measures logistic models with prespecified thresholds. Results: The 3-year incidence of grade ≥1 (9.2% vs 2.0%; P=.028) and grade ≥2 (5.7% vs 0%; P=.012) rectal toxicity favored the spacer arm. Grade ≥1 urinary incontinence was also lower in the spacer arm (15% vs 4%; P=.046), with no difference in grade ≥2 urinary toxicity (7% vs 7%; P=0.7). From 6 months onward, bowel QOL consistently favored the spacer group (P=.002), with the difference at 3 years (5.8 points; P<.05) meeting the threshold for a MID. The control group had a 3.9-point greater decline in urinary QOL compared with the spacer group at 3 years (P<.05), but the difference did not meet the MID threshold. At 3 years, more men in the control group than in the spacer group had experienced a MID decline in bowel QOL (41% vs 14%; P=.002) and urinary QOL (30% vs 17%; P=.04). Furthermore, the control group were also more likely to have experienced large declines (twice the MID) in bowel QOL (21% vs 5%; P=.02) and urinary QOL (23% vs 8%; P=.02). Conclusions: The benefit of a hydrogel spacer in reducing the rectal dose, toxicity, and QOL declines after image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer was maintained or increased with a longer follow-up period, providing stronger evidence for the benefit of hydrogel spacer use in prostate radiation therapy.
ISSN 03603016
Educational Use Research
Learning Resource Type Article
Publisher Date 2017-04-01
Publisher Place United States
Journal International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Volume Number 97
Issue Number 5


Open content in new tab

   Open content in new tab