Thumbnail
Access Restriction
Subscribed

Author Chesevar, Carlos Ivn ♦ Maguitman, Ana Gabriela ♦ Loui, Ronald Prescott
Source ACM Digital Library
Content type Text
Publisher Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
File Format PDF
Copyright Year ©2000
Language English
Subject Domain (in DDC) Computer science, information & general works ♦ Data processing & computer science
Subject Keyword Argumentation ♦ Argumentative systems ♦ Defeasible argumentation ♦ Defeasible reasoning ♦ Reasoning
Abstract Logical models of arguement formalize commonsense reasoning while taking process and computation seriously. This survey discusses the main ideas that characterize different logical models of argument. It presents the formal features of a few features of a few main approaches to the modeling of argumentation. We trace the evolution of argumentation from the mid-1980s, when argument systems emerged as an alternative to nonmonotonic formalisms based on classical logic, to the present, as argument in embedded in different complex systems for real-world applications, and allow more formal work to be done in different areas, such as AI and Law, case-based reasoning and negotiation among intelligent agents.
ISSN 03600300
Age Range 18 to 22 years ♦ above 22 year
Educational Use Research
Education Level UG and PG
Learning Resource Type Article
Publisher Date 2000-12-01
Publisher Place New York
e-ISSN 15577341
Journal ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Volume Number 32
Issue Number 4
Page Count 47
Starting Page 337
Ending Page 383


Open content in new tab

   Open content in new tab
Source: ACM Digital Library