Thumbnail
Access Restriction
Subscribed

Author Markov, A. V. ♦ Ivnitsky, S. B. ♦ Kornilova, M. B. ♦ Naimark, E. B. ♦ Shirokova, N. G. ♦ Perfilieva, K. S.
Source SpringerLink
Content type Text
Publisher Pleiades Publishing
File Format PDF
Copyright Year ©2016
Language English
Subject Domain (in DDC) Natural sciences & mathematics ♦ Life sciences; biology
Subject Keyword Life Sciences ♦ Cell Biology ♦ Biochemistry ♦ Zoology ♦ Ecology
Abstract Adaptation to contrasting environments can facilitate ecological divergence and sympatric speciation. The factors that influence the probability and rate of these processes are poorly known. We performed an evolutionary experiment on Drosophila melanogaster in order to attain a better understanding of adaptation dynamics and to model the initial steps of sympatric speciation. In our experiment, several populations were cultured either on standard rich medium (MR) or on nutrient-deficient starch-based medium (MS). After ten generations, the experimental populations demonstrated unexpected changes in their fitness: on the starch medium, flies (Drosophila melanogaster, D.m.) grown on MR (D.m.$_{MR}$) outcompeted those that were cultured on MS, whereas Dm$_{MR}$ were outcompeted by D.m.$_{MS}$ on the rich medium. That is, experimental populations demonstrated higher fitness on the foreign medium but were outcompeted by the aliens on the medium they were accustomed to. To explain the paradox, we hypothesize that the observed low fitness of D.m.$_{MS}$ on MS was due to maternal effect, or the “effect of the starving mother.” D.m.$_{MS}$ are probably better adapted to MS, but the phenotypic outcome of their adaptations is obscured because the females grown on the poor medium invest less in their offspring (for instance, they may produce nutrient-deficient eggs). Larvae hatched from such eggs develop successfully on the MR but experience delayed growth and/or lower survival rate on the nutrient-deficient MS. To test the hypothesis, we measured the fitness of the flies D.m.$_{MS}$ after culturing them for one generation on MR in order to remove the assumed maternal effect. As expected, in this case D.m.$_{MS}$demonstrated higher fitness on MR compared to control flies (D.m.$_{MR}$) and to D.m.$_{MS}$ before the removal of the maternal effect. The results support the idea that non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and maternal effects can mask adaptation to adverse environments and prohibit ecological divergence and speciation by allowing the migrants from favourable habitats to outcompete resident individuals in adverse ecotopes despite the possible presence of specific adaptations in the latter.
ISSN 20790864
Age Range 18 to 22 years ♦ above 22 year
Educational Use Research
Education Level UG and PG
Learning Resource Type Article
Publisher Date 2016-10-21
Publisher Place Moscow
e-ISSN 20790872
Journal Biology Bulletin Reviews
Volume Number 6
Issue Number 5
Page Count 7
Starting Page 429
Ending Page 435


Open content in new tab

   Open content in new tab
Source: SpringerLink