Thumbnail
Access Restriction
Open

Author Takaki, Naoyuki ♦ Shinoda, Yoshihiko ♦ Watanabe, Masayuki ♦ Yoshida, Kazuo
Source CiteSeerX
Content type Text
File Format PDF
Language English
Subject Domain (in DDC) Computer science, information & general works ♦ Data processing & computer science
Subject Keyword Evolutional Concept ♦ Core Design ♦ Deep Geologic Medium ♦ Key Unnecessary Element ♦ Pure Recovery ♦ Fast Reactor Recycle System ♦ Impedimental Element ♦ Back End ♦ Evolutional Recycle Concept ♦ High-level Waste ♦ Front End ♦ Adaptable Separation Scheme ♦ Stable Fission Product ♦ Minimizing High Level Waste ♦ Rough Removal ♦ Conventional Cycle ♦ Major Parasitic Neutron Absorber ♦ Fast Reactor ♦ Production Rate ♦ Final Disposal Aspect ♦ Fuel Cycle ♦ Necessary Element ♦ Neutronic Aspect ♦ Unnecessary Element ♦ Neutronic Feasibility ♦ Various Aspect ♦ Unconventional Recycling Scheme
Description Proceedings 7 th OECD/NEA Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, October 14-16, 2002, Jeju, Republic of Korea
JNC has proposed an evolutional concept of fast reactor recycle system for minimising high-level waste (HLW) by adopting an unconventional recycling scheme based on the idea of “rough removal of unnecessary elements ” instead of a conventional one as “pure recovery of necessary elements”. The concept was named “ORIENT-cycle ” (Optimisation by Removing Impedimental Elements). “Unnecessary elements ” to be removed were listed up from various aspects such as core design, front end and back end of the fuel cycle. Stable fission products that amount to about 60wt % of all FPs were identified as one category of key “unnecessary elements ” from a neutronic aspect and also final disposal aspect because they were major parasitic neutron absorbers if recycled and were not required to be disposed in deep geologic media. Adaptable separation schemes and the neutronic feasibility of the multi-recycling were discussed. The production rate of HLW was reduced by a factor of around 10 compared with a conventional cycle.
Educational Role Student ♦ Teacher
Age Range above 22 year
Educational Use Research
Education Level UG and PG ♦ Career/Technical Study
Learning Resource Type Article
Publisher Date 2003-01-01